I hope you find some useful information about logical fallacies and debating tactics we frequently come across.

The moralistic fallacy is a pervasive logical error that occurs when one assumes that what is morally right must also be natural, and conversely, anything deemed immoral is unnatural. This fallacy can manifest in various forms, leading to flawed reasoning and conclusions. Understanding the intricacies of this fallacy is crucial for enhancing critical thinking and decision-making processes across different domains.

1 Forms of the Moralistic Fallacy

The moralistic fallacy takes several forms, each contributing to a distorted view of reality. One common manifestation is the assumption of impossibility, where one concludes that because something leads to socially unpleasant consequences, it cannot be true. This argument often follows the structure: “If X were true, then Z would happen! Thus, X is false,” where Z represents an undesirable outcome.

The “No True Scotsman” fallacy is a type of informal logical fallacy that involves defending a generalization by arbitrarily excluding counterexamples. It occurs when someone makes a universal claim about a group or category, and upon encountering evidence that contradicts this claim, they redefine the group in a way that excludes the counterexample.

Conspiracy theories are explanations for events that involve secret plots by powerful individuals or groups. They often defy established knowledge and logical reasoning, instead relying on speculation and unverified claims.

In the world of debate and rhetoric, reductio ad absurdum is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone has the audacity to argue that something can’t be true by pointing out that it would be absurd for it not to be true.

There is a new test how new LLMs: Gemma2, Qwen2 and Mistral Nemo - do in logical fallacy Detection, comparing with 10+ other models

In good old medieval times fighters were training to fight stramen first, because those couldn’t fight back. Now strawman is a type of incorrect [rethoric in the debate](https://logicalfallacy.org/.